Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants In Patients Research Articles

Adherence and clinical outcomes for twice-daily versus once-daily dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: Is dosing frequency important?

Twice-daily dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may reduce drug adherence compared with once-daily dosing of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), thus worsening clinical outcomes. We evaluated adherence to apixaban and dabigatran requiring twice-daily dosing compared with edoxaban or rivaroxaban with a once-daily dosing regimen and the subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with AF. Adherence to each NOAC and outcomes were compared between patients who were diagnosed with AF and initiated NOACs between 2016 and 2017 using Korean claims data. High adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) of the index NOAC ≥80%. The clinical outcomes included stroke, acute myocardial infarction, death, and composite outcome. A total of 33,515 patients were analyzed (mean follow-up, 1.7 ± 1.3 years). The proportion of patients with high adherence to NOACs was 95%, which did not significantly differ according to the dosing regimen. The mean PDC for NOACs was as high as ~96%, which was the highest for apixaban users, intermediate for edoxaban or rivaroxaban users, and lowest for dabigatran users, regardless of the dosing regimen. Adverse outcomes in low adherence patients for each NOAC were higher than that of high adherence patients, regardless of the dosing frequency. Adherence between once- and twice-daily dosing NOACs in patients with AF was high and similar among both dosing regimens. Patients with low NOAC adherence had poorer clinical outcomes, regardless of the dosing frequency.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with β-Thalassemia.

Background. Patients with β-thalassemia have a high incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other supraventricular arrhythmias. The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with β-thalassemia has not been systematically evaluated. Methods. We enrolled patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia, who were on treatment with NOACs for thromboembolic prophylaxis of supraventricular arrhythmias. Data on thromboembolic and bleeding events were collected. Results. Eighteen patients were enrolled. The patients had a history of AF (sixteen), typical atrial flutter (five), and atypical atrial flutter (four). The patients were treated with dabigatran (seven), apixaban (five), rivaroxaban (four) or edoxaban (two). The mean follow-up duration was 22 ± 15 months. No thromboembolic events were reported. No major bleedings were observed. Three patients had non-major bleeding events. Two patients reported dyspepsia during treatment with dabigatran and were shifted to a different NOAC. Conclusions. Our study suggests the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients affected by transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia.

Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.

Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are scarce. Therefore, the impact of frailty on AF-related outcomes and benefit-risk profiles of NOACs in patients with frailty were investigated. AF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Frailty was assessed with the Claims-based Frailty Indicator. Among 254478 anticoagulated AF patients, 71638 (28.2%) had frailty. Frailty was associated with higher all-cause mortality risks [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.43-1.54)], but not with thromboembolism or bleeding. Among subjects with frailty (78080 person-years of follow-up), NOACs were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) [aHR 0.77, 95%CI (0.70-0.86)], all-cause mortality [aHR 0.88, 95%CI (0.84-0.92)], and intracranial bleeding [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.66-0.91)], a similar major bleeding risk [aHR 1.01, 95%CI (0.93-1.09)], and higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk [aHR 1.19, 95%CI (1.06-1.33)] compared with VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban [aHR 0.84, 95%CI (0.76-0.93)], similar with edoxaban [aHR 0.91, 95%CI (0.73-1.14)], and higher with dabigatran [aHR 1.16, 95%CI (1.03-1.30)] and rivaroxaban [aHR 1.11, 95%CI (1.02-1.21)] compared with VKAs. Apixaban was associated with lower major bleeding risks compared with dabigatran [aHR 0.72, 95%CI (0.65-0.80)], rivaroxaban [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.72-0.84)] and edoxaban [aHR 0.74, 95%CI (0.65-0.84)], but mortality risk was higher compared with dabigatran and edoxaban. Frailty was an independent risk factor of death. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants had better benefit-risk profiles than VKAs in patients with frailty, especially apixaban, followed by edoxaban.

Safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with well-controlled warfarin in Thai patients with atrial fibrillation.

In trials of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were not inferior to warfarin for thromboembolic and bleeding events. However, there are scant data comparing the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF with that of well-controlled warfarin treatment in such patients. To compare total bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with AF who received NOACs, with the same events in those who received well-controlled warfarin treatment. We used retrospective data from patients with AF who received NOACs or well-controlled warfarin at the Central Chest Institute of Thailand from January 2017 to December 2019. The primary outcome was total bleeding or thromboembolic events or both. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality, total bleeding events including major or minor bleeding, and thromboembolic events including ischemic stroke or systemic embolization. We included data from 180 patients with AF, 90 who received NOACs and 90 who received well-controlled warfarin. The average time in the therapeutic range for those who received warfarin was 84.9% ± 9.8%. The patients who received well-controlled warfarin had more frequent thromboembolic or total bleeding events or both than those who received NOACs (odds ratio [OR] 3.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-4.07; P = 0.01). There were more minor bleeding events in those who received well-controlled warfarin (OR 3.75; 95% CI 2.79-4.71; P = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in thromboembolic events, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality between the 2 groups. Thai patients with AF who received NOACs had less thromboembolic or total bleeding events than those who received well-controlled warfarin treatment.

Impact of P-glycoprotein and/or CYP3A4-interacting drugs on the risk-benefit profile of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) Background P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4-interacting drugs influence plasma levels of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). However, the clinical relevance is questioned. Purpose A critical appraisal of the impact of pharmacokinetically-interacting drugs on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods After searching Pubmed and Embase, phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and longitudinal observational cohort studies on the impact of concomitantly used P-gp/CYP3A4-interacting drugs on the risk-benefit profile of NOACs in AF patients during a mean/median follow-up of ≥6 months were included. A fixed effects meta-analysis was performed with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results Fifteen studies were included (10 post hoc analyses of RCTs, 5 observational studies), investigating 21,711 and 306,421 NOAC-treated AF patients with and without P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor use respectively, while only one study included P-gp/CYP3A4 inducers. In NOAC-treated AF patients, concomitant use of P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors was associated with significantly higher major bleeding (relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.01-1.19)) and all-cause mortality risks (RR 1.14, 95%CI (1.05-1.23)) compared to not using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, while the risks of stroke/SE (RR 0.88, 95%CI (0.77-1.01)), intracranial bleeding (RR 0.89, 95%CI (0.68-1.15)) and gastro-intestinal bleeding (RR 1.09, 95%CI (0.91-1.30)) were not significantly different. Concomitant use of amiodarone with NOACs was associated with lower thromboembolic (RR 0.75, 95%CI (0.61-0.92)), but higher mortality risks (RR 1.21, 95%CI (1.05-1.39)). Co-administration of verapamil or diltiazem was associated with higher major bleeding risks (RR 1.64, 95%CI (1.31-2.06)), but no significantly different thromboembolic or mortality risks. Conclusions Given the higher bleeding and mortality risks in NOAC-treated AF patients concomitantly using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors compared to NOAC users not taking interacting drugs, close monitoring of these patients is warranted, including regular medication review and addressing modifiable bleeding risk factors. Regarding P-gp/CYP3A4 inducers, a considerable research gap was identified, necessitating more research on their impact.

Real-World Comparisons of Low-Dose NOACs versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Patients with AF: A Meta-Analysis.

Objective We aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose NOACs by performing a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Background Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) showed inferior efficacy compared with standard-dose NOACs, although they are still frequently prescribed for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the clinical practice. Methods Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched from the inception to September 9, 2021, for cohort studies that compared the efficacy and/or safety of low-dose NOACs in patients with AF. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke and major bleeding, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GH). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with the random-effect model. Results Twenty-five publications involving 487856 patients with AF were included. Compared with standard-dose NOACs, low-dose NOACs had comparable risks of ischemic stroke (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.11), major bleeding (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.28), ICH (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.36), and GH (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.33), except for a higher risk of mortality (HR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.65). Compared with warfarin, low-dose NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (HR = 0.72, 95% CI .67 to 0.78), mortality (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.77), major bleeding (HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.79), ICH (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.77), and GH (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.95). Conclusions Low-dose NOACs were comparable to standard-dose NOACs considering risks of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, ICH, and GH, and they were superior to warfarin. Low-dose NOACs might be prescribed effectively and safely for patients with AF. Considering limitations, further well-designed prospective studies are foreseen.

Impact of P-glycoprotein and/or CYP3A4-interacting drugs on effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4-interacting drugs influence plasma levels of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). However, the clinical relevance is questioned. Therefore, the impact of pharmacokinetically-interacting drugs on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was investigated. A meta-analysis was performed based on randomized controlled trials and observational studies retrieved from Pubmed and Embase that investigated the impact of concomitantly used P-gp/CYP3A4-interacting drugs on the risk-benefit profile of NOACs in AF patients. Fifteen studies were included, investigating 21 711 and 306 421 NOAC-treated AF patients with and without P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor use respectively, while only 1 study included P-gp/CYP3A4 inducers. In NOAC-treated AF patients, concomitant use of P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors was associated with significantly higher major bleeding (relative risk [RR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.01-1.19]) and all-cause mortality risks (RR 1.14, 95%CI [1.05-1.23]) compared to not using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, while the risks of stroke/systemic embolism (RR 0.88, 95%CI [0.77-1.01]), intracranial bleeding (RR 0.89, 95%CI [0.68-1.15]) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.09, 95%CI [0.91-1.30]) were not significantly different. Concomitant use of amiodarone with NOACs was associated with lower thromboembolic (RR 0.75, 95%CI [0.61-0.92]), similar major bleeding (RR 0.92, 95%CI [0.80-1.07]) but higher mortality risks (RR 1.21, 95%CI [1.05-1.39]). Coadministration of verapamil or diltiazem was associated with higher major bleeding risks (RR 1.64, 95%CI [1.31-2.06]), but comparable thromboembolic (RR 1.10, 95%CI [0.75-1.61]) and mortality risks (RR 1.01, 95%CI [0.77-1.33]). Given the higher bleeding and mortality risks in NOAC-treated AF patients concomitantly using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, close monitoring is warranted.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients with advanced chronic kidney and liver diseases.

Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or chronic liver disease (CLD) is frequent in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) because of their common risk factors. Chronic kidney disease and CLD superimposed on AF are associated with increased risks of thrombosis and bleeding, which further complicates the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs). Because currently approved non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) undergo certain degrees of metabolism and clearance in the liver and kidney, increased exposure to medications and risk of bleeding are major concerns with the use of NOACs in patients with advanced CKD and CLD. Besides, these patients were mostly excluded from landmark trials of NOACs and related cohort studies are also limited. Therefore, the optimal strategy for the use of NOACs in this population remains unclear. This review would go through current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of NOACs in AF patients with advanced CKD and CLD and provide a comprehensive discussion for clinical practices.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with valvular heart disease.

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have transformed the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), but are only approved by regulatory authorities for stroke prophylaxis in patients with so-called “non-valvular AF.” This terminology has spawned confusion about which patients with valvular heart disease benefit from NOACs and which should be treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) instead. Patients with valvular heart disease other than mechanical prosthetic valves or severe mitral stenosis (including those with bioprosthetic valves) were included in pivotal trials demonstrating the benefit of NOACs over VKAs, and consensus guidelines recommend NOACs over VKAs in these patients. Subsequent devoted randomized controlled trials in patients with AF and bioprosthetic valves, including transcatheter valves, have confirmed the safety of NOACs in this population. In patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis, observational studies indicate that NOACs may be safe and effective, but randomized controlled trials are ongoing. By contrast, a randomized controlled trial showed that dabigatran is harmful in patients with mechanical prosthetic mitral valves; however, these data may not extrapolate to patients with mechanical valve prostheses in other locations or to other NOACs, and randomized controlled trials are ongoing. In this review, we discuss these data in greater depth, and make recommendations for the use of NOACs in patients with valvular heart disease.

Rivaroxaban Once-Daily vs. Dose-Adjusted Vitamin K Antagonist on Biomarkers in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation (ROAD HF-AF): Rationale and Design of an Investigator-Initiated Multicenter Randomized Prospective Open-Labeled Pilot Clinical Study.

Background: Clinical trials of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation (AF) have demonstrated reduced risks of stroke and bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Here, we aim to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, a NOAC, compared with warfarin, a VKA, and the effects of rivaroxaban on cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with reduced ejection fraction (≤40%) and AF.Methods: Rivaroxaban Once-daily vs. dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonist on biomarkers in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation (ROAD HF-AF) is a randomized, open-labeled, controlled, prospective, multicenter pilot study designed to assess cardiovascular biomarkers and the safety of rivaroxaban (20 or 15 mg in patients with creatinine clearance 30–49 mL/min per day) compared with VKA (target international normalized range: 2–3) in 150 patients hospitalized with ADHF and AF. The primary endpoint is the change in circulating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hsTn) during hospitalization. The secondary endpoints are bleeding, hospital stay duration, in-hospital mortality, and changes in cardiovascular, renal, and thrombosis biomarkers. Patients will be followed for 180 days.Conclusion: We hypothesize that rivaroxaban will reduce myocardial injury and hemodynamic stress, as reflected by the biomarker status, within 72 h in patients with ADHF and AF, compared with VKA. We hope to facilitate future biomarker-based, large-scale outcome trials using NOACs in patients with ADHF and AF, based on the results of this multicenter, randomized, controlled study.

The Safety and Efficacy of Standard-Dose versus Low-Dose Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus.

Background Data comparing different doses of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) regarding resolution of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are scarce. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of standard-dose versus low-dose NOACs in patients with nonvalvular AF and LAAT. Methods Patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before interventional procedures for the detection of LAAT and treated with NOACs from October 2014 to September 2020 in Ningbo First Hospital were retrospectively screened. The study population was divided into two groups according to the doses of NOACs: standard-dose group (dabigatran 150 mg, twice daily; rivaroxaban 20 mg, once daily) and low-dose group (aged ≥75 years, body weight <50 kg, or creatinine clearance <50 mL/min; dabigatran 110 mg, twice daily; rivaroxaban 15 mg, once daily). Repeated TEE was performed 1, 2, and 3 months later. The rate of LAAT completely resolved and incidence of thromboembolic and major bleeding events were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 24 patients were included, 14 patients in the standard-dose group and 10 in the low-dose group. After 3 months, LAAT was completely resolved in 12 out of 14 (85.7%) and 8 out of 10 (80%) patients treated with standard- and low-dose NOACs, respectively. The rate of LAAT completely resolved was comparable between groups. No thromboembolic or major bleeding events occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion Low-dose NOACs are a safe and effective option for the treatment of LAAT in some special subset patients. However, the results warrant validation in a prospective study.

The Importance of Appropriate Dosing of Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Preventing thromboembolic events, while minimizing bleeding risks, remains challenging when managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors contribute to current dosing patterns of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including patient characteristics, comorbidities, and physician judgment. Application of NOAC doses inconsistent with the drug labels may cause patients to receive either subtherapeutic (increasing stroke risk) or supratherapeutic (increasing bleeding risk) anticoagulant levels. In clinical practice, under- or over-dosing of NOACs in patients with AF is not uncommon. This analysis of prospective and retrospective registry and database studies on NOAC use in patients with AF (with at least 250 patients in each treatment arm) showed that under-dosing may be associated with reduced effectiveness for stroke prevention, with similar or even increased bleeding than with the standard dose. This may reflect underlying conditions and patient factors that increase bleeding despite NOAC dose reduction. Such factors could drive the observed overuse of reduced NOAC dosages, often making the prescription of reduced-dose NOAC an intentional label deviation. In contrast, over-dosing more likely occurs accidentally; instead of providing benefits, it may be associated with worse safety outcomes than the standard dose, including increased bleeding risk and higher all-cause mortality rates. This review summarizes the main findings on NOAC doses usually prescribed to patients with AF in clinical practice.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in (morbidly) obese or low body weight patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) Background Oral anticoagulants are crucial for preventing systemic thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF), with guidelines preferring non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the general AF population. However, as NOACs are administered in fixed doses, concerns of unintentional underdosing in morbidly obese patients and unintentional overdosing in underweight patients have emerged. Moreover, VKAs are still recommended in morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m², body weight &amp;gt;120 kg) due to lack of data for NOACs in these patients. Purpose A critical appraisal of the benefit-risk profile of NOACs in AF patients across the body weight spectrum.  Methods After searching the Medline database, phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and longitudinal observational cohort studies on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus VKAs in obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), and class III obese (BMI ≥40 kg/m²) non-valvular AF patients, and in low body weight (≤60 kg) AF patients during a mean/median follow-up of ≥6 months were included. The meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results A meta-analysis based on 4 phase III RCTS and 3 longitudinal observational cohort studies demonstrated that NOAC use in obese and class III obese AF patients was associated with significantly lower stroke/systemic embolism (stroke/SE) risks (RR 0.82, 95%CI [0.71-0.96]; and RR 0.75, 95%CI [0.64-0.87], respectively), similar to lower major bleeding risks (RR 0.83, 95%CI [0.69-1.00]; and RR 0.74, 95%CI [0.57-0.95], respectively), and similar mortality risks (RR 0.92, 95%CI [0.73-1.15]; and RR 1.17, 95%CI [0.83-1.64], respectively) as compared to VKAs. In AF patients ≤60 kg, significantly lower stroke/SE (RR 0.63, 95%CI [0.56-0.71]) and major bleeding risks (RR 0.71, 95%CI [0.62-0.80]), and similar mortality risks (RR 0.68, 95%CI [0.42-1.10]) were observed for NOAC- versus VKA-treated patients in a meta-analysis based on 4 phase III RCTs and 2 longitudinal observational cohort studies. Conclusions The benefit-risk profile of NOACs seems preserved in (morbidly) obese AF patients and patients with low body weight of ≤60 kg. However, more data are needed in underweight AF patients (BMI &amp;lt;18.5 kg/m²) and on differences between NOACs to further optimize management in these patient subgroups.

Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Over the past few decades, a series of innovative medicines have been developed in order to optimize anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). As a result, a number of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) that directly target the enzymatic activity of factor II and factor Xa have been successfully licensed providing a more predictable effect and better safety profile compared to conventional anticoagulants (heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)). However, comparative efficacy and safety data is limited in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (i.e., CKD stage 4/5 and end stage renal disease) because patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were actively excluded from landmark trials, thus representing a major clinical limitation for the currently available agents. However, the renal function of AF patients can be altered over time. On the other hand, patients with CKD have an increased risk of developing AF. This review article will provide an overview of current concepts and recent evidence guiding the clinical use of NOACs in patients with CKD requiring chronic anticoagulation, and the associated risks and benefits of treatment in this specific patient population.

Trends in Stroke Prevention between 2014 and 2018 in Hospitalized Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

In recent years, significant changes in stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been observed. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are more commonly used in the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with AF. The aim of the study was to evaluate recommended stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF and to identify predictors of using NOACs in patients treated with anticoagulant therapy. The present study was a retrospective, observational, single-center study which included consecutively hospitalized patients in the reference cardiology center from January 2014 to December 2018. In the study group of 4027 patients with AF, to prevent thromboembolic complications, OACs were used in 3680 patients (91.4%), an antiplatelet drug(s) was used in 124 patients (3.1%), and 223 patients (5.5%) did not undergo any thromboembolic event prevention. In the group of 3680 patients treated with OACs, 2311 patients (62.8%) received NOACs and 1639 patients (37.2%), VKAs. Independent predictors of the use of NOACs were age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; P < 0.001), a previous thromboembolic event (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.01–1.65; P=0.04), nonpermanent AF (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.34–1.93; P < 0.001), and eGFR (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02–1.46; P=0.03). Between 2014 and 2018, an increase of patients treated with OACs, mainly with NOACs, was observed. Age, past thromboembolic complications, nonpermanent AF, and preserved renal function determined the choice of NOACs.

Critical appraisal and issues regarding generalisability of comparative effectiveness studies of NOACs in atrial fibrillation and their relation to clinical trial data: a systematic review

ObjectiveTo critically appraise the published comparative effectiveness studies on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Results were compared with expectations formulated on the basis of...

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and (Morbid) Obesity or Low Body Weight: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Oral anticoagulants are crucial for preventing systemic thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF), with guidelines preferring non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the general AF population. However, as NOACs are administered in fixed doses, concerns of unintentional underdosing in morbidly obese patients and unintentional overdosing in underweight patients have emerged. Therefore, a critical appraisal of the benefit-risk profile of NOACs in AF patients across the body weight spectrum is needed. After searching Medline, this systematic review discusses the impact of body weight on the risk-benefit profile of NOACs versus VKAs. The meta-analysis demonstrated that NOAC use in obese and class III obese AF patients (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 and ≥ 40kg/m2, respectively) was associated with significantly lower stroke/systemic embolism (stroke/SE) risks (RR 0.82, 95%CI [0.71-0.96] and RR 0.75, 95%CI [0.64-0.87], respectively), similar to lower major bleeding risks (RR 0.83, 95%CI [0.69-1.00] and RR 0.74, 95%CI [0.57-0.95], respectively) and similar mortality risks (RR 0.92, 95%CI [0.73-1.15] and RR 1.17, 95%CI [0.83-1.64], respectively) compared to VKAs. In AF patients ≤ 60kg, significantly lower stroke/SE (RR 0.63, 95%CI [0.56-0.71]) and major bleeding risks (RR 0.71, 95%CI [0.62-0.80]), but similar mortality risks (RR 0.68, 95%CI [0.42-1.10]), were observed for NOAC- versus VKA-treated patients. The benefit-risk profile of NOACs seems preserved in (morbidly) obese AF patients and patients with low body weight. However, more data are needed on underweight AF patients (BMI < 18.5kg/m2) and on differences between NOACs in these patients.

Clinical Performance of Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Real-World Obese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

The prevalence of both atrial fibrillation (AF) and obesity has steadily increased. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown to be more effective and safer than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for long-term stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF. There are still limited data in the literature regarding performance of NOACs in obese patients with AF in the "real world." The aim of our study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of NOACs versus well-controlled VKA therapy in obese AF patients in a "real-world" setting. Here, we have considered patients with AF and obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m2) on NOAC or VKA therapy included in the multicenter Atrial Fibrillation Research Database (NCT03760874). The occurrence of major bleedings (MBs) and thromboembolic events (composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism) was respectively considered primary safety and effectiveness outcomes. We identified 1,047 AF patients with obesity who received NOAC (n = 272) or VKA (n = 775) treatment. After propensity score matching analysis, 248 NOAC and 496 VKA recipients with similar clinical characteristics, including BMI (34.8 ± 3.4 in NOAC vs. 35.1 ± 3.8 in the VKA group; p = 0.50), were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 39 ± 7 months. The incidence rate of thromboembolic events was 1.10 per 100 person-years (0.67 in NOAC vs. 1.28 in the VKA group; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-1.22; p = 0.19). The incidence rate of MB was 1.9 per 100 person-years (1.1 in NOAC vs. 2.28 in the VKA group; HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.88; p = 0.04). The incidence rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 0.4 per 100 person-years (0.27 in NOAC vs. 0.47 in the VKA group; HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.12-2.73; p = 0.48). A positive net clinical benefit (NCB) of NOACs over VKAs was found (+0.91). Presence of anemia (HR: 1.75; p = 0.003) and concomitant use of antiplatelet drugs (HR: 2.41; p = 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of MB; moreover, age (HR: 1.65; p = 0.003) was an independent predictor of thromboembolic events. Our data support the hypothesis of safe and effective use of NOACs in patients with AF and obesity, justified by a statistically significant lower incidence of MB and a favorable NCB over VKAs.

Patients with diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: meta-analysis of eight outcomes in 58634 patients across four randomized controlled trials.

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEE). This meta-analysis assessed the benefit/risk balance of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. warfarin, and explored whether there was effect modification by DM or heterogeneity in outcomes between NOACs in patients with and without DM. We performed a meta-analysis of 58634 patients from four Phase 3 trials of NOAC vs. warfarin in patients with AF, comparing the primary outcomes of efficacy and safety and six other secondary outcomes in patients stratified by the presence of DM. Interaction testing was used to assess for heterogeneity of treatment effects. A meta-regression was performed to evaluate the influence of baseline characteristics. NOACs reduced the risk of stroke/SEE in 18134 patients with DM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.69-0.93), I2 3.90] to a similar degree as in 40500 patients without DM [HR 0.82; 95% CI (0.74-0.91), I2 16.33; P-int 0.81]. There was no effect modification of DM on the relative reduction with NOACs vs. warfarin in major bleeding (DM: 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.20, I2 43.83; no DM: 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.24; I2 87.90; P-int 0.37). Intracranial haemorrhage (HRs 0.51 and 0.47, P-int 0.70) and cardiovascular death (HRs 0.87 and 0.90, P-int 0.70) were significantly reduced by NOACs in the presence or absence of DM. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are more effective and safer than warfarin in AF patients with or without DM. Absent contraindications, NOACs should be the anticoagulation treatment choice in patients with diabetes.

P471Experience with the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of hemorrhagic complications

Abstract Background. The use of NOACs in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a difficult task due to the tendency to hemorrhage in these patients associated with CLL. The use of targeted ibrutinib (Ib) therapy in the treatment of CLL patients increases the risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopathy. A feature of targeted Ib therapy is the need for daily and lifelong use. One of the cardiotoxic effects of Ib is the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). Some patients receiving Ib have a history of AF. Warfarin is contraindicated in patients taking Ib, so all patients received NOACs. Purpose. To evaluate the possibility of using NOACs in CLL patients receiving Ib, taking into account the frequency and severity of hemorrhagic manifestations, the need to cancel, reduce the dose and replace with another NOACs. Methods. We examined and observed the dynamics of 224 patients with CLL receiving Ib from 5 to 56 months at a dose of 420 mg per day as 1, 2, 3, and 4 lines of CLL therapy. Patients with CLL aged 32 to 91 years (66.0 (59.0-72.0) years) were Included, of whom 82 are women aged 39 to 83 years (64.0 (54.0-71.0 ) years) and 142 men aged 32 to 91 years (66.0 (60.0-72.0) years). All hemorrhagic manifestations in patients receiving Ib and NOACs were evaluated, taking into account the glomerular filtration rate and platelet count. Results. AF were revealed in 51 patients with CLL receiving Ib. AF was registered in 32 patients during the treatment with Ib, in 19 patients AF was before prescribing of Ib. The need for NOACs because of AF arose in 38 patients with CLL who were prescribed rivaroxaban (n = 11), dabigatran (n = 6), apixaban (n = 21). Hemorrhages were observed in 88.2% of patients receiving NOACs and Ib, represented by hematomas (n = 32), petechiae (n = 4), nosebleeds (n = 6), gingival bleeding (n = 7), hemorrhage in the anterior chamber of the eye (n = 1), hemorrhage in the sclera of the eye (n = 3) and macrohematuria (n = 4). A combination of several hemorrhagic manifestations (combined hemorrhages) was observed in 40.7% of CLL patients receiving NOACs. 10 patients were transferred to the minimum dose of apixaban 2.5 mg twice a day due to the development of recurring nosebleeds (n = 5), macrohematuria (n = 3), large, recurring hematomas with localization on the neck and face (n = 1 ), hemorrhages in the anterior chamber of the eye (n = 1). Cancellation of NOACs in 1 patient was associated with recurrent macrohematuria. Rivaroxaban 20 mg per day was canceled in 6 patients due to the development of persistent thrombocytopenia of less than 50 × 109/L. Conclusions. There were no life-threatening hemorrhages. The main reason for the withdrawal of NOACs was persistent thrombocytopenia. Due to hemorrhagic complication, NOACs was canceled only in 1 patient, 10 patients (26.3%) required a transfer to the minimum dose of apixaban. The arising hemorrhages did not require hospitalization of patients.